Dude...

Apr. 11th, 2017 12:35 pm
dwolfhunter: (MAD SCIENCE)
...you did NOT really turn down a Peerage.
...you did NOT really tell the AE Principal of the Chivalry to pull your name from the pollings.
...you did NOT Tell a SCAdian King to go to hell and then give him the gas money to get there.

You're right...I did not. I responded negatively to a touchy conversation designed to take my temperature regarding that Peerage. I would like to say I was sober at the time...I was not. I would like to say I approached the discussion with an open mind and a chivalrous spirit...I did not. But had it been said at an event( rather than at a party with an open bar) that My King and the Order was set on inducting me(rather than "Well they're considering you for...")...I would have acceded reluctantly.

Yes...I REALLY did tell the AE Principal of the Chivalry to remove me indefinitely from the Chivalry poll. I had separated from my knight and I saw no way that the Order was going to bother considering me as anything but a joke...so I begged a favor from and old friend and dropped all hopes of being knighted...ever.

Yes...yes I did. In court.
dwolfhunter: (Default)
I am going to really stir the pot here.I am going to postulate a theory that comes close to blasphemy. No historical example of Chivalry is really all that good in terms of use for the SCA. As usual we need to look at this like generalists, not specialists. Many of DeCharny's,Lull's,Keen's theories and usages are VERY good exemplars of what we should be doing. But the Victorian model has good points as well.Chiefly its idealism and sense of fairplay.
I would suggest that it is time for the Chivalry and Royalty of the SCA to create their OWN model.To establish real and concrete standards for themselves. Using the classical texts and the victorian ideals as source materials and using their own judgement to fill in the gaps.
I argue that chivalry is a flexible concept bound by an iron band. The flexible concept is the "Ideal". The iron band is "Do what is right because it's the right thing to do." Why must we be bound by anything other than "Do the right thing"? Because it's still possible to do the right thing for the wrong reasons. The reason I say that the Chivalry need to do this is that they are the living examples that SCA communities look to for edification.
Thus, they must be the new arbiters of what chivalry for the SCA is. Some are some aren't.
Now, that's very hard thing to do. It's difficult to establish hard standards when you (like everybody else) are trammelled by feet of clay. But what makes y'all knightly/noble is your ability to transcend the muck and mire of daily life and carry yourselves as knights/nobles. Therefore it falls to y'all to create the new example.
A new example that calls forth the ancient ethos of chivalry but is tempered by the idealism of victorian sensibility and modern common sense. There are MANY knights and Peers who do exactly this everyday in every kingdom. Look around you and take on that mantle for yourselves. Then pass that knowledge and enforce it rigorously.
Open a new book on what model of chivalry we in the SCA use. Your time has come. You are the yardstick we will all measure ourselves against. We will weigh ourselves, measure ourselves and (if you have truly been good examples) we will not be found wanting when our time comes.

If I'm wrong say so...but it's how I feel.

Profile

dwolfhunter: (Default)
dwolfhunter

June 2017

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829 30 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 23rd, 2017 04:36 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios